Difference between revisions of "2015-08-20"

From Digital Scholarship Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 75: Line 75:
 
* There are forums for support.
 
* There are forums for support.
 
* JM recommends DSG have guidelines on how to use Omeka in a manner that makes ingestion into DRS easier
 
* JM recommends DSG have guidelines on how to use Omeka in a manner that makes ingestion into DRS easier
 +
* Mostly useful for class projects; public digital hx, etc.

Revision as of 11:50, 20 August 2015

assessmemnt

events tracking

  • Part of our assessment project (for ourselves & the library)
  • DSG has used Podio to create an Events form
  • Amanda demos

consulting

  • Library likes to keep track of how much we consult w/ other departments
  • Podio also has a new form that Amanda has created (w/ Sarah's help) to track consultation

mentoring

  • LM interested in programming topics
  • SB in XML, XPath, XSLT, TEI, RELAX NG, etc.
  • AC ditto (including XQuery)
  • BS geo-spatial
  • HC © & fair use; open access

omeka under the hood

  • content management system
  • "wordpress for museums"
  • was used on Our Marathon
  • ECDA started in it, then went elsewhere
  • DRS does some of same stuff better
  • May be a presence on campus where students being asked to gather & curate
  • Hx dept interested

DSG & Omeka

Our Marathon

  • using old version of Omeka
  • highly customized
  • Reclaim hosting has a one-click install
  • (Ryan C. uses that service)

structure

  • has items, which have metadata
  • uses basic DC metadata; also has item types (w/ additional metadata for some kinds of types, which Our Marathon did not use)
  • plugin for extended
  • collections is a set of items
  • item can only be in 1 collection
  • Omeka does not have sets
  • Omeka does have exhibits, more curational than sets of DRS
  • also has tags
search
  • capability less than optimal and has a somewhat icky interface
  • e.g., will not search on words ≤ 3 chars long, so "red sox" …
exhibit
  • An exhibit has pages
  • A method of hand-creating a page that draws on items
  • Various options for arrangement of text & images with a drag-and-drop interface
  • Seems you can either link to an item or suck it in
  • PY reports exhibits used to be very buggy; JM's experience is not so buggy
  • Omeka originally designed for 1 person to be creating site, so when multiple folks work on it there are problems
  • Simple Pages are just blank slate for exhibit page, rather than a template (or, perhaps, a blank template … :-)
neatline
  • exhibit-building plug-in
  • lets people tell stories using maps & timelines
  • often require lots of customization
  • can use Google Maps templates
  • create records that link items (and their metadata) to things on your map
  • by default all your metdata pops up
  • JM describes a method of getting around this problem (that I did not catch)
  • Our Marathon hacked neatline a bit
  • Basic neatline template is pretty simplistic — image on top, text underneath
summary
  • JM: "I'm not in love with Omeka"
  • Has some interesting capabilities for creating certain types of sites; i.e. is useful.
  • There are forums for support.
  • JM recommends DSG have guidelines on how to use Omeka in a manner that makes ingestion into DRS easier
  • Mostly useful for class projects; public digital hx, etc.