2016-09-15

From Digital Scholarship Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
  • Julia visited the University of Oklahoma
  • We’re having a visitor from the University of Uppsala on the 29th.
  • We will also be having a visiting scholar through the NULab.


Charon talk:

  • Last time we talked was about content workflow.
  • We are now circling back to the administrative tasks.
  • These include being able to assign tasks to users, give them roles, etc.
  • The assumption is that MODS will be used for descriptive cataloging.
  • We need to think about how each project gets to shape their own metadata.
  • What are our standards for ingestion?
  • Scenario: Do we want volunteers or students on a project to have every option for metadata editing or just some?
  • It's likely we will create a template where you click to configure metadata - you choose what fields you want, and they will have a drop down list of where an admin can choose who is allowed to edit those.
  • We can add a MODS extension schema if needed
  • Cerberus requires title and keyword for ingestion.
  • Charon will require?... Title, keyword, collection were initially on the table, but came to the decision that it just needs some identifiable title and a collection suggestion.
  • For the submission interface, we want to make it simple as possible to add items.
  • Charon pipes will be the way people configure editorial workflows
  • It will be drag and drop modules for different kinds of tasks.
  • The systems automatically brokers ongoing tasks assignments based on how these pipes are set up.