Difference between revisions of "DSG DRS Project Toolkit Spec Meeting Minutes"

From Digital Scholarship Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
'''July 8, 2015'''
 
'''July 8, 2015'''
 
Working notes:
 
Working notes:
*Eli added Libraries line to the footer (branding); Patrick seemed to think it was sufficient.
+
*Eli added Libraries line to the footer (branding); Patrick seemed to think it was sufficient. Discussion of double footer instilling the DSG.
 
*Eli added the logic for ISSUU to see if there is an ISSUU link; if there is, the image will be replaced with the actual embedded reader. Patrick noted that there may be a license key that makes the "Open publication: Free publishing" line go away; Eli will ask Hillary about that.
 
*Eli added the logic for ISSUU to see if there is an ISSUU link; if there is, the image will be replaced with the actual embedded reader. Patrick noted that there may be a license key that makes the "Open publication: Free publishing" line go away; Eli will ask Hillary about that.
 
*Eli removed the
 
*Eli removed the

Revision as of 12:00, 8 July 2015

DRS Project Toolkit Spec

Meeting Minutes

July 8, 2015 Working notes:

  • Eli added Libraries line to the footer (branding); Patrick seemed to think it was sufficient. Discussion of double footer instilling the DSG.
  • Eli added the logic for ISSUU to see if there is an ISSUU link; if there is, the image will be replaced with the actual embedded reader. Patrick noted that there may be a license key that makes the "Open publication: Free publishing" line go away; Eli will ask Hillary about that.
  • Eli removed the
  • Eli is working on adding the Creator to the Search view (he doesn't think it will take long).
  • We discussed what should be configurable or editable on the back-end of the page. Should users be able to change search / browse. In terms of what it relates to the DRS content
  • Discussion of how sets will be exposed. If you wanted your entire site to be based just off a set and not an entire collection, the PID numbers could be used; Patrick stressed the need to attend to sets. Putting in another option where you can input a set. For example, if you have eighteen items you want to highlight in July, you can create that set in the DRS. Search and Solr won't work with sets.
  • Important question about searching content: making distinctions between collections and sets
  • Revised way of handling sets. Result will be different (search will work different). Projects will be limited to collection or sets.
  • Eli is almost at a point where he can bring test sites up on a server.
  • Discussion of NIEC content and the particular challenges / nuances of its content.
  • There's a need to hash out the way that galleries work. Defining what a "gallery" is, how it is distinguished from an "exhibit."The word "gallery" suggests curation.
  • Discussion of creating shortcodes to generate Playlists, Sliding gallery, tiled gallery, etc. We have three now: the tiled gallery and the image carousel, and the video playlist. Specific challenge of embedding an object
  • Version 3.0 or 4.0 plan: option to send set directly to Toolkit page (Patrick idea)
  • We don't begin a WordPress instance with anything but a collection.
  • The less you bring over into WordPress, the better.
  • Shortcodes are taking over for the Media Library.
  • I can bring in a collection, or I can bring in a set.
  • There is an item-level API call A shortcode to embed a specific item; or a way of creating an "annotated page"

-something that displays an item (thumbnail), selected metadata records (a caption of sorts), quadrants that allow people to display image and text in particular ways.

  • "If WordPress goes away, the cat dies."
  • Clean up the discussion of why we're avoiding the Media Library, what the consequences of using the Media Library are, etc.

July 1, 2015

  • Eli has disabled comments on attachment pages. Unless requested, we don't really want comments on anything
  • Discussion of searching: solution to have the DRS search be the main search, and then have a "Related Content" search bar in the sidebar. Eli has come up with a "Related Content" sidebar (the name can be easily changed later, and most likely should be, given that "content" is a term broadly applied to all content on the site)
  • The "Browse" page doesn't currently show "Related Content," and we're going to keep that off that page for now, given the desire to make distinctions between "Search" and "Browse.'
  • Facets aren't in conversation with the related search: Eli will make sure that Related Content will update when users modify search results using facets so that relevant content will also materialize.
  • Jim has also updated the content on facets in the spec to discuss the modeling of the DRS when it comes to displaying more than 5 facets
  • We've modified the spec to finalize the "Sort By" parameters on Search and Browse pages to: Relevance, Date (earliest to latest), Date (latest to earliest), Title A-Z, Title Z-A, Creator A-Z, Creator Z-A. We're scrubbing references to "Date Uploaded."
  • We've decided to display the Date and Creator info in "Search" results pages but not on "Browse" results pages (which are more designed to function as a mosaic).
  • We're going to create a section of the spec that briefly discussed branding: where to put "Northeastern University Library" and where to put "Digital Scholarship Group" documentation, etc.
  • Discussion of Image download options: we're going to remove the current option for "Thumbnail Images."
  • Discussion of "Zoom" function on images in items: works on items, doesn't work on exhibits (i.e., images taken from the WordPress Media Library and added to exhibit pages). We discussed the fact that exhibit-builders could have the option of zoom functionality via Shortcodes.
  • Eli has used code to create video playlists on video items.
  • Future discussions at meetings: what do we want to be configurable (by project managers) on the WordPress pages? More on Exhibits / sample exhibits for new Toolkit projects. User testing. Page-turning functionality and how that impacts discussions of page-turning availability during project development (ideally a discussion that happens at the DRS ingest stage).

June 19, 2015

  • We decided to meet weekly to discuss necessary revisions to the spec draft and to help answer questions and brainstorm the development of the DRS Project Toolkit pages for projects.
  • We agreed that Minamaze was an ideal WordPress theme for the pilot phase.
  • We discussed the desire / need users will have to be able to search both items and content elsewhere on a project site (exhibit pages, "About" pages, etc.). We are still discussing the best interface / solution to this issue: a search box that can search everything on the site? A search of DRS items and an "expanded" search that searches pages?
  • We also discussed the need to do user testing on the search functionality, and whether it makes sense to do "A/B" testing of two kinds of searches.
  • Item views: if not an item from the DRS, WP will create attachment page and item view will be that WP-native page. IF item from DRS, code will override WP route to attachment page and show dynamically retrieved DRS item.
  • Option: make uploaded file PID editable so that even images uploaded by hand can automatically link to DRS.
  • Who will do the work of creating Arader and Sadow websites? Also need to test the “make an exhibit” scenario.

Notes